Hifzul Iman by Ashraf Ali – Download as PDF File .pdf), Text File .txt) or read online. in PDF format Book Hifzul iman by ashraf ali thanvi. ya han deo kay bando kay aqaid is ibarat ko parhyan aur likhnay walay pay lanat bhajan.
|Published (Last):||17 September 2013|
|PDF File Size:||16.69 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||17.54 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
In sum, these words carried apparent insolence and offence hence to utter such words will be kufr:. This is such an ugly statement that no Muslim would like to read this statement, forget about talking about those people who have this belief or those who try to uman this.
They also did not make any interpretation. It is matter urvu choice upon deobandis that whose fatwa of kufr they hlfzul to accept? Who on this earth need any interpretation of this statement?
At the gathering, the Ulema expressed their views on the paragraph in Hifzul Iman. It is matter of choice upon deobandis that whose fatwa of kufr they want to accept? He spent ten years there and passed away there in AH. Before Imam Ahmed Raza Khan issued the fatwathere was already fatwa by other scholars and mass rally against this work of Mawlana Ashraf ali thanvee.
Click Here to read Large Scan Quote: Maktaba Thanvi, Karachip. The verdict of polytheism is passed on the basis of things, which are obvious, not wilful, or urdi or deduced.
Hifzul Iman and Shaykh Thanvi
Why did you oppose this? To Uo this confusion we need to know Two basic Facts: To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: The other side of story: The actual paragraph is this: The reason being is that every person has the knowledge of certain matters which are hidden to others.
The Fatwa which was issued upon Mawlana Ashraf Ali Thanvi has nothing to do with denial of ilm e ghayb knowledge of the unseen which prophet had. The Deobandi uurdu says that to make the meaning clear Mawlana Asharf ali urduu made changes in the text! The blasmphemous comment was used to degrade our beloved prophet sal allahu alaihi wa sallam. Such knowledge of unseen is also possessed by all and sundry Zayd, Amr ; even mian, lunatics and all the animals and quadrupeds.
My grandfather stood and expressed his disgust at the book and said. That is false as it is, but then to write that this sort of knowledge is also possessed by the various creatures he mentioned, is extreme disrespect against our Master sal Allahu alayhi wasallam. This is such an oman statement that no Muslim would like to read this statement, forget about talking higz those people who have this belief or those who try to justify this.
So who is right?
Why did you oppose this? Since he had great affection for my grandfather he invited him too. The Deobandi author says that to make the meaning clear Mawlana Asharf ali Thanvi made changes in the text!
He spent ten years there and passed away there in AH. The original Urdu text of fatwa and its Arabic translation, both are online. If any one says Imam Ahmed Raza Khan rh made interpretaion he should bring evidence in support of such a claim.
The Deobandi author in an attempt to justify this writing says that.
hifzul iman ki gustakhana ibarat – Munazra & Radd-e-Badmazhab – IslamiMehfil
Who on this earth need any interpretation of this statement? Read the Original Large Scans: In sum, these words carried apparent hivz and offence hence to utter such words will be kufr: There is no more beating around the bush, when I have brought the explanations by deobandi akabirs who knew what Mawlana Thanvi wrote and meant!.
Hazrat Shah Abul Khair Dihlawi found it hiffzul displeasing and said: In fact, I think this is the only sentence in the whole book that was changed. They also did not make any interpretation.
The verdict of polytheism is passed on the basis of things, which are obvious, not wilful, or intended or deduced. Medias this blog was made to help people to easily download or read PDF files. The blasphemous comment was used to degrade our beloved Prophet sal allahu alaihi wa sallam Best of Creation.
This is another lie. Hazrat Shah Abul Khair Dihlawi found it utterly displeasing and said: This rumous does not make any sense as Imam Ahmed Raza made no tawil.
It also looks as though Thanvi concedes that the text desrespects the Prophet sal Allahu alayhi wasallam. The other side of story: This is another lie. Al-Muhannad Page 28, by ulama of Deoband. He translated it word by word into Arabic and presented it to the scholars of Makkah and Medina.
This rumous does not make any sense as Imam Ahmed Raza made no tawil. However, since it carried implications of offending and disregard of honour and respect the ruling was thus given:. There is no more beating around the bushwhen I have brought the explaination by deobandi akabirs who knew what Mawlana Thanvee wrote and meant!.